Local Broadcasters Investing in Investigative Reporting
While robust investigative work was often a casualty of the recession, many local broadcasters say true enterprise reporting, costly as it is, is vital to their survival
By Michael Malone -- Broadcasting & Cable, 10/17/2011 12:01:00 AM EDT
WRC Washington had seen its eminence in DMA No. 9 slip over the
years, a product of NBC’s ailing primetime, a lack of commitment from
parent GE and improved local competition. But when Comcast took
over NBC this year and vowed to reinvigorate the 10 owned stations, Camille
Edwards, VP of news, petitioned the new parent for some cash to bring back
the investigative reporting unit that WRC had scrapped a few decades before.
Edwards had barely gotten the request out when the answer came back as a yes.
Hiring has begun for the as-yet-unnamed three-person I-team, which will get an assist
from NBC News and its various marquee properties, such as Today and Dateline,
on stories Edwards said will be about people that are wronged and those who are
responsible for the wrongdoing. Promos for the I-team began in early October, and
reports from the gumshoe crew are scheduled to be on-air by the end of the month.
Edwards suspects a top-notch investigative unit can bring WRC—one of several stations
in the NBC owned group relaunching well-funded I-teams with Comcast-NBCU’s
blessing—back to its former glory. “For a long time, the station felt there was a void in
that area,” said Edwards. “The new owners and new stations boss [president Valari Staab]
made a reinvestment in the stations, and we’re certainly reaping the benefits.”
Investigative reporting is expensive and labor intensive,
and its returns are hard to quantify. As a
result, such journalism is, by almost all accounts, on
the decline in the U.S. But several stations, capitalizing
on the demise of newspapers in their markets
and the billions of dollars in political revenue set
to gush in over the next 12 months, are bucking
the trend and using rock-solid investigative journalism
to reinforce their brands, firm up the relationship
with viewers and, ultimately, increase ratings
points and revenue. Viewers, who are increasingly
bombarded with the white noise of news and information
from social media and an endless array
of digital outlets, are asking their local stations to
dig a little deeper and offer them some substance.
“Investigative has generally been in decline over
a prolonged period of time, but I think it’s turned
a corner and become more important to people,”
said Ray Heacox, president and general manager of
KING Seattle, which claimed a prestigious duPont-
Columbia award this year for a series on wasted tax
dollars in the Washington State ferry system. Amidst
the immediacy and ubiquity of online news, Heacox
said, people are less reliant on local TV for breaking
news. “They’re looking for you to take it to the next
level, and I think there’s actually a bit of a shift toward
more signi! cant journalism,” he said. “That can
mean taking on really big investigative reporting.”
Too Costly, Too Difficult
The recession, which hit local television particularly
hard, expedited the retrenchment in stations’ commitment
to investigative journalism. The Investigative
Reporters and Editors (IRE) association noted in
a recent Federal Communications Commission study
that its broadcast membership dropped from 874 to
648 from 2000 to 2010, while stations’ submissions
for IRE awards fell by more than half since 1999.
“When the belts tighten, there are a variety of ways to save money,” said Bob Papper,
journalism professor at Hofstra University and author of the Hofstra /RTDNA local news
studies. “Investigative reporting is the most expensive thing, so it’s going to take a hit.”
The rise of backpack journalists, with their lower salaries and ability to produce
packages on the " y, may have hurt the investigative field, too. Station management,
faced with limited budgets and larger content demands from their newsrooms—the
average station cranks out 5 hours and 18 minutes of local news a day, reports a Hofstra/
RTDNA study, 18 minutes more than last year—opted to put their resources into
these multimedia jacks of all trades. It’s not hard to see the logic when two or three
one-man bands, hired for the price of a lone investigative journalist, can produce
dozens of pieces in the time it takes the investigative dude to get records back from a Freedom of Information Act filing for a story that may never air.
“Things that are harder to do take longer. The stories that turn
around quicker are more attractive,” said Tom Rosenstiel, director
of Pew Research Center’s Project For Excellence in Journalism. “It’s
hard to escape the structural trends.”
Some broadcast leaders are imploring their brethren to pick up the
torch. CBS News Chairman Jeff Fager, keynoting at the RTDNA “Excellence
in Journalism” convention last month, challenged the roomful
of news vets in New Orleans to keep shining their investigative
lights in dark places. “I think
a lot of people shy away from
[investigative journalism] because
it’s expensive and it’s
difficult and it takes a lot of
time,” Fager said. “We succeed
at 60 Minutes by…caring
about it and by working
hard to make it as interesting
as we can, because there is a
place for it and I think there’s
a hunger for it out there.”
Viewer studies reinforce
Fager’s belief. Laura Clark,
senior VP at Frank N. Magid
Associates, said viewers are increasingly demanding more substantial
information, and more of an investigative approach,
from local stations. It’s on TV reporters to unearth hard news
that those in their community cannot simply pull up on
Google, Clark said. “What drives viewer decisions is the quality
of the content,” she said. “The overarching answer is, viewers
are asking [stations] to investigate everything—there has
to be an investigate/uncover/dig tone to everything they do.”
Stations in a Strong Position
A handful of media trends pave the way for stations to reinvigorate their investigative
efforts. First, the sorry state of newspapers, which have lost 30% of their workforce
since 2000 according to the Pew Research Center’s recent “State of the Media”
survey, opens the door for stations to pick up enterprise reporting slack. The same
survey showed local TV is the “outlet of choice” for 55% of respondents, far more
than the Internet (16%) and newspapers (14%).
There is no shortage of stories about government waste and civic corruption, but
with print newsrooms often a shell of their former selves, there may be a shortage
of reporters there to ferret them out. “There are stories to be told. There are things
that go on that need to be covered,” said Bob Sullivan, VP of content at Scripps. “If
we’re not doing it, then who will?”
And while every station is feeling the squeeze of a shaky economy and a corporate
parent that wants more done with less, local TV will get some $2.5-$3.3 billion in
political spending between now and next November, according to Kantar Media/
CMAG. While that revenue is already baked into current budgets, the more enterprising
broadcasters will allocate some of that for their I-teams. “It depends on the
finances and the philosophy of the company,” said Rosenstiel. “If they feel that’s a way
to shift viewership and change the ratings trend, they’ll put that money on the air.”
Stations of Substance
In a world where there may only be room for a few TV news departments in a
given market, a number of local TV chiefs say the time is right to define and burnish
their brand with robust investigative work. Management at KMOV St. Louis, a distant
No. 2 to KSDK for years, set out to boost its local presence through an enhanced Iteam.
The Belo station now has five full-timers in its crew, up from three a few years
ago. “When the world fell apart in 2008,
we said, ‘What are the ways we can differentiate
ourselves in the market?’” said Sean
McLaughlin, KMOV news director. “We feel
strongly that investigative is the one thing
that sets us apart and increases the bond
between us and our viewers.”
Ratings suggest it is working; McLaughlin
notes that KMOV won the 10 p.m. news
race in September in both households and
the 25-54 demographic for the first time in
his four-year tenure at the station. “I think
we stayed top of mind through our investigative
efforts,” McLaughlin said. “If it’s done
right, it’s absolutely a differentiator.”
While not every station’s parent sees the
merits of a seasoned I-team, several are
making similar moves. Fully half of the NBC
owned group, including WRC, WMAQ
Chicago and KNTV San Francisco, are in
the process of launching investigative units.
WMAQ is bringing back the Unit 5 crew
that had been dormant for 30-plus years,
listing a pair of producer positions in an effort
to reestablish the team—and take on
WLS for Windy City primacy. “We’re figuring
out how to be No. 1, and we think
original, hard-hitting content gives us an
advantage,” said Frank Whittaker, WMAQ
VP of news/station manager. “Our thought
is that will bring more viewers into the tent.”
Scripps’ recent $212 million deal to acquire
the McGraw-Hill stations was that much more
attractive, said Brian Lawlor, Scripps senior
VP, because of their investigative chops. “The culture of McGraw-Hill stations fits so well
with ours,” Lawlor told investors. “They’re truly dedicated to the mission of community
service, to high-quality journalism and to meaningful investigative reporting.”
So much a part of the company DNA is investigative that Scripps footed the bill for
60 local producers and reporters to attend the IRE convention in Orlando in June,
along with a corporate recruiter. Sullivan said ABC News correspondent Brian Ross,
who gave a keynote to the Scripps group on investigative reporting at the conference,
could not believe everyone in the room was part of the same station group. “He said,
‘Wow, there is hope,’” Sullivan said.
Comcast in Their Corner
Measuring the return on an investigative investment is difficult. But Scott Blumenthal,
LIN Media executive VP, breaks it down to its elements when explaining why the broadcaster
has expanded investigative teams at CBS-Fox pair WPRI-WNAC Providence and
NBC-Fox duo WAVY-WVBT Norfolk, among others, while getting one off the ground at
Fox af! liate WALA Mobile. “Viewers want to know we’re
out there representing their best interests,” Blumenthal
said. “If we do a good job, that should mean more ratings.
More ratings should mean more revenue.”
News veterans suggest other bene! ts of a highly visible
investigative brand. There’s the goodwill in the community
after a policy-changing investigative report, such
as KING’s on food stamps being dealt on the black market
and KNXV Phoenix’s piece on fudged kidnapping
statistics that brought down the city’s police chief. Strong
investigative stations may be top of mind when tipsters
pick up the phone, leading to new enterprise stories,
and the so-called “Big J” journalism stations attract the best reporters. “People want to
work for quality news organizations,” Peter Diaz, Belo executive VP, told B&C recently.
Morale in the NBC owned group had suffered under GE’s tight fist, but WRC newsroom
chief Edwards, who lured Rick Yarborough, ace executive producer, from rival
WTTG for the new I-team, said spirits are sky-high again on the eve of the investigative
unit’s relaunch. “It’s through the roof,” Edwards said. “This shows that our new bosses
believe in investigative work and have put their money where their mouth is.”
E-mail comments to mmalone@nbmedia.com and follow him on Twitter: @BCMikeMalone
